The story Columbus in Chains, by Jamaica Kincaid presented an opportunity to evaluate storys main character Annie Johns upbringing as compared to a modern day Midwestern education, an education that is derived from a mostly White, Anglo-Saxon, Protestant (WASP) society. I am able to empathize with what Annie was taught in her classes because I also have become aware of my ancestors mistreatments.
Annie, the storys heroine, is a native to Antigua. She learns that the British Settlers enslaved her Antiguan ancestors. It would appear obvious to the reader that the British committed terrible atrocities. My Indian ancestors were also enslaved and mistreated.
For Annie, some of this information came from her history class although she also learned from outside sources. As to the sources, the reader can only speculate.
I too had a dual sided education. The first is the public school systems interpretation of history (American settler propaganda). The second comes from many different sources I have experienced through my upbringing. For example, I was taught about the murdering of Native Americans through plays.
Being raised in a home that found it important to seek the truth in all matters including history, it was from my parents that I learned many of the atrocities that were inflicted upon American Indians by the European settlers.
I also became more aware through various pieces of literature, film, television, and special interest groups of Americas negative activities.
Because the history that is taught in the public school systems in censored and picked by mostly W.A.S.P. officials, there are many variations from other schools of thought. Being only taught what the public school system wanted me to learn I came to realize that I was fed countless lessons of pure propaganda. From the beginning in my memories I can recall the many tales of how America came to be at the hands of mostly European immigrants.
What Annie John learns in class is different from what she finds out about her ancestry.
Annie was taught from the British perspective. That state of mind was to the effect that the British were emancipating the Native Antigens from their pagan ways. Surely there is no mention in her books of the terrible misdeeds committed by Columbuss followers. What she learns in class is different from what she finds out about her ancestry. She discovers the terrible acts that the British imposed upon her people years ago.
In the public school system I learned that the American side I was on was always the right or correct side. Annie was taught that her British influenced schooling and way of life was the proper path to live by. We both have been conditioned to believe that our ancestors where in the right. I have two sides to choose from. Annie could choose from two sides as well but she knows of the terrible things that were done to her ancestors by the British.
Annie and I have come to find that not everything that is our history has been portrayed properly or documented at all in the schools.
I know that the Native American side of my make up had faced many atrocities at the hands of the Europeans encroaching on their native lands, murdering and enslaving. I also know from sources outside of the school systems that many other things have happened to the Native Americans.
The education I have received from public schools has made me two things. A skeptic of what my government teaches me and open minded to seeking out more sources to find the truth. I think that Annie feels the same in regards to the skepticism although she seems to be more hate filled about it. Being deceived by the same people that are teaching you makes it difficult to side with them or whom they represent.
Like Annie John I have found many variations from what I consider to be the truth. To my best belief, the things taught to me in history class have been colored at best and untruthful at worst.
Having grown up in a school system that teaches the American people the things it does makes me wary. Annie John also seems to show resentment towards what the school is teaching her. Because I cannot trust what I have been told by these people. I cannot side with them.
I have not chosen to side with any particular party. The only attempt I make to take a side is by doing what I believe my God would want me to do. The reader can only speculate as to what Annies guiding force would be.
Although the previous paragraph may infer that I hate the country that did the things they did. It simply is not so. I love my country; it is the government and who runs it that worries me. I do believe Annie John feels the same. She shows no animosity to her peers in regards to race. In the story she only holds disdain for her teacher because she is the one feeding the children the misinformation.
Annie does not seem to have the clearest line drawn when it comes to picking a side. It would seem that she would automatically side with her heritage. It is true that she is somewhat rebellious. In the story she makes a point of showing her obstinacy to the teacher of her class. Even though Annie seems to follow most rules. She could assimilate herself into the British culture.